how to describe a good reputationicra 2023 call for papers


Conference committee will recognize the three best presentation Papers during ICARA 2023. Does submitted code need to be anonymized? Reviewing loads will be light (hopefully only 2-3 papers in each of Phase 1 and Phase 2). This option adds value; ones RA-L submission has the opportunity to be presented at IROS. Nominated authors will be invited to submit extended versions of their AAAI-21 papers for fast-track consideration. This is a violation of anonymity, since the message may go out to many potential reviewers. Q. A. (2) Avoid citing previous, unpublished work that would surely identify the authors (e.g., a previous technical report or PhD thesis which substantially overlaps with the current submission); such citations may be added to the camera ready. Yes. Condition 4 ensures that reviewers have a direct way of viewing the material (albeit at a lower quality) and are also able to verify that the externally hosted material has not been modified since the supplemental material deadline. Do not provide information that may identify the authors in the acknowledgments (e.g., co-workers and grant IDs) and in the supplemental material (e.g., titles in the movies, or attached papers). Given this definition, any submission to CVPR should not have substantial overlap with prior publications or other concurrent submissions. A single PDF file with (1) cover letter (2) full reviews from ICRA 2021 and (3) original rejected paper. NeurIPS/EMNLP Fast Track: rejected papers with *final, average* scores of at least 4.9 (NeurIPS-20) or 2.8 (EMNLP-20 long papers) may be submitted directly into AAAIs Phase 2 along with previous reviews, paper ID, etc. Examples of negative societal impact include potential malicious or unintended uses (e.g., disinformation, generating fake profiles, surveillance), environmental impact (e.g., training huge models), fairness considerations (e.g., deployment of technologies that could further disadvantage historically disadvantaged groups), privacy considerations (e.g., a paper on model/data stealing), and security considerations (e.g., adversarial attacks). Authors are encouraged to make a detailed response to each point raised by reviewers, and are free to explain any errors they believe that reviewers made. Q. The conference scope includes machine learning (deep learning, statistical learning, etc), natural language processing, computer vision, data mining, multiagent systems, knowledge representation, human-in-the-loop AI, search, planning, reasoning, robotics and perception, and ethics. 1.

An author response document describing all changes made since the NeurIPS/EMNLP submission. Does a document on GitHub or other open repositories count as a publication, and therefore is ineligible for review and publication at CVPR 2022? Can we get my quota increased for the size of paper submission from 50 MB to something higher? Conversely, if releasing the dataset is not possible, then it should not be a key contribution of your paper. To preserve anonymity, you should not cite your public codebase. The inclusion of a URL is encouraged as well, where appropriate. Q. A. Q. Please enter the GitHub link in a standalone text file in a submitted ZIP file. If you experience any technical problems with the CMT site, please contact the AAAI-21 Workflow Chairs at aaai21workflowchairs@aaai.org. Q. Link or repository access should not reveal author or reviewer identity. Explain your situation either in your paper or in the supplemental material and ensure to include sufficient information to support that you followed the ethical principles set up in the ethics guidelines. Submissions that have placeholder (test, xyz, etc.) In general, empirical results often depend on implicit assumptions, which should be articulated. Moreover, such anonymous data storage must not allow authors to discover who accessed the data in any way. Q. But we encourage code submissions to aid reproducibility. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection, and will be reported to the other venue to which the submission was sent. YES, it is the expectation that your dataset will be ready and available at the time when submitting the camera ready, since at this point the paper that describes the dataset is considered final as well. A. The Conference Committee especially encourages submissions in these focus areas, and will highlight these at the conference in separate sessions. A. Furthermore, no publication substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to this or another conference, workshop, or journal during the review period. If a paper receives two reviews that are both sufficiently negative, it will be rejected without any opportunity for author feedback.

A. CVPR is a double blind conference, so authors should make a reasonable effort to anonymize the submitted code and data. (b) The paper for review (PDF only) must be submitted first before the supplementary material (PDF or ZIP only) can be submitted. You are not required but encouraged to do so. Avoid providing links to websites that identify the authors. Submissions may consist of up to 7 pages of technical content plus up to two additional pages solely for references, an ethics statement if applicable (see below); acknowledgements should be omitted from papers submitted for review, but may be included in these two additional pages for accepted papers. Authors must be very careful not to violate the double blind review requirements in any supplementary material to prevent their paper from being summarily rejected. This is an automatic process and does not constitute the authors promoting their work. We will make more information available as it is finalized. Q. A. We note that these sister events have independent program committees and review processes, so we are unable to move papers after submission from AAAI to a sister conference or vice versa. If the authors use an existing, published dataset, we encourage, but do not require them to check how data was collected and whether consent was obtained. Why the longer period of social media silence? Are there any specific license requirements for dataset contributions? Generally, papers should not use datasets that have been withdrawn by their creators, as doing so may involve ethical violations or even legal complications. Supplementary material can be submitted until November 23, 2021 (extended to November 24, 2021).

Please direct suggestions for the program and other general inquiries to the AAAI-21 Program Cochairs at aaai21chairs@aaai.org. arXiv papers are often corrected and modified; the site is set up to support this scientific process of revision. A violation occurs only when authors are proactively doing so.

A. This information will be visible to the reviewers and area chairs, who will be asked to verify during the review process whether the authors indication is consistent with the paper content.

For example, attention to a particular arXiv paper cannot be gathered from arXiv itself.

In such a case your paper must stand on its other (e.g. Nevertheless, in cases where such prior work is widely known in the field, its existence may be considered by reviewers in assessing a submissions novelty. Make sure the supplementary material does not reveal author identity. No. s r.o.

In addition, the contact author and contact information cannot be changed after the abstract submission deadline. For example, a paper that emphasizes methodological contributions and makes weak connections to a social impact application may stand more chance of acceptance in the main technical track. Q. The program chairs reserve the right to reject papers with grave ethical issues, but expect this to occur only in exceptional circumstances. AAAI-21 welcomes submissions reporting research that advances artificial intelligence, broadly conceived. Authors must properly anonymize the written submission as per the guidelines. While we do not have a formal ethics review process, reviewers will be asked to flag any significant ethical concerns.

The three intems above should be put in a single PDF file (separate from the IROS 2021 paper file), and submitted as an attachment. (3) When neither previous option is appropriate, cite as Anonymous (2019) to indicate that a citation has been suppressed. One possible path would be to obtain clearance from an independent IRB service. However, all authors need to provide their conflict domains. In addition, if your video is hosted on a video platform that behaves similar to a social media platform (such as YouTube, Douban, or Blibli) then your video post must be unlisted and have comments disabled.

* Paper registration and submission dates are fixed, no extension will be given. Do NOT apply security settings to your PDF file. Q. If you want to receive a confirmation email, please click the paper ID to view the submission, and then click the Email button at the top right to send the confirmation to yourself or all the authors. Conflict Responsibilities: It is the primary author's responsibility to ensure that all authors on their paper have registered their institutional conflicts into the submission system CMT3 (see details under Domain Conflicts below). Please do so only in exceptional circumstances, e.g. Neuro-Symbolic AIApproaches melding neural and symbolic reasoning are emerging as a hot topic in the AI community. Does a paper automatically get rejected if it does not discuss limitations? Can my post mention a paper that is in review (without mentioning CVPR)?

Template Download: If the use of such data has not (yet) been approved by an IRB, authors should provide information on any pending approval process, how the data was obtained, as well as discuss if and how consent was obtained (or why it, perhaps, could not be obtained). In the end, all decisions will be made based only on the opinions of AAAI reviewers, SPC members and area chairs. Dual/Double Submissions: The goals of CVPR are to publish exciting new work for the first time and to avoid duplicating the effort of reviewers. Can I update my papers information (e.g., title, abstract, author list, subject areas, questionnaire) after the paper registration deadline?

The author rebuttal is optional and is meant to provide you with an opportunity to rebut factual errors or to supply additional information requested by the reviewers. A short video (1-minute maximum) can also be attached to your paper to supplement results (see Instructions below). Papers must be in trouble-free, high-resolution PDF format, formatted for US Letter (8.5 x 11) paper, using Type 1 or TrueType fonts. This text box should only be used for this specific purpose all other points, including questions about limitations, must be addressed in the rebuttal PDF. A. Authors are free to retract a submission from a venue with a concurrent review process (e.g., from NeurIPS or EMNLP) and submit the same work to AAAI-21 as a regular paper provided that this retraction occurs before the AAAI-21 submission. This page references conferences listed on the CORE conference portal If we (authors) did not discuss potential societal impact in the paper, will the paper be automatically rejected? Q. If the paper improves the quality of generative models, authors might point out that their approach can be used to generate deep-fakes for disinformation. All authors must complete a reproducibility checklist. We have set hard limits of 50MB (PDF Only) for paper submission and 100MB (PDF or ZIP only) for supplementary materials for submissions for review. Q. A. A. YES. Like previous AAAI conferences it will feature technical paper presentations, invited speakers, workshops, tutorials, poster sessions, senior member presentations, competitions, and exhibit programs, all selected according to the highest standards. Once the deadline has passed, we regret that we will be unable to make individual exceptions or to correspond with authors regarding circumstances that prevented timely submission. We encourage authors to discuss this, because it is beneficial for the community to be aware of this issue. Please send queries about author instructions and conference registration to aaai21@aaai.org. for training or experimentation) continues to be permitted. Instead present your results referring to the method proposed in your paper and draw conclusions based on the experimental comparison to other results. What about pseudocode instead of code? It also excludes university technical reports, which are typically not peer reviewed. Publication: All accepted papers will be made publicly available by the Computer Vision Foundation (CVF) two weeks before the conference. Such discussion shall point out any strong assumptions and how robust the results are to violations of these assumptions (e.g., independence assumptions, noiseless settings, model well-specification, asymptotic approximations only held locally). MPG, MPEG or MP4 video formats can be used. The following document and media formats are allowed: avi, mp4, pdf, wmv. Once the online proceedings are released, the CVPR website will provide a list of all papers with dataset contributions and include a link to the author-provided URL in order to facilitate wide dissemination of new datasets to the CVPR audience. The deadline for such submissions is September 29.

version of the submission that is put up without any form of direct peer-review is NOT considered prior art and should NOT be cited in the submission. Discussion of Limitations: Considering the limitations of an approach is an important part of good academic scholarship. Authors are advised to consult each events CFP carefully and to use their best judgement in determining where to submit their work. Authors should consider adding hi-res images as supplementary material (see supplementary material guidelines). (d) Code can be submitted as part of the supplementary ZIP file or through anonymous GitHub repositories (include the link in a separate text file in the supplementary ZIP). This includes responses where the margins and formatting are deemed to have been significantly altered from those specified by the style guide. No exceptions will be granted. No, a dedicated section is not required. Note that many of these policies and guidelines are directly inspired by adjacent academic communities such as NeurIPS. Supplementary material deadline is one week after paper submission deadline. All submissions will be handled electronically via the conference's CMT Website. You may optionally add a figure, graph, or proof to your rebuttal to better illustrate your answer to the reviewers' comments. Authors should think carefully about which track is most appropriate for their work. Thus we would like to encourage dataset creators to provide this information to the public. A. The policy applies only to those papers that claim the release of a dataset as one of its core scientific contributions. A. We also do not wish to discourage the publication of similar ideas that have been developed independently and concurrently. What should I do? How do I delete Supplementary Material from the CMT site? Any social media promotion of a paper incurred in this period, proactively initiated by the authors, is considered a policy violation. How do I cite my results reported in open challenges? It is possible to do this through code that is not standalone -- for example, with proper documentation. However, the scientific conclusions based on the dataset at submission time must be sound and must continue to hold. The selection of the best presentation Papers will be made on the basis of the review process results and of an ad-hoc presentation by the selected runners-up. In case (2), AAAI reviewers will review each submission independently, but will be provided the additional information as soon as they submit their own review; if they made a reject recommendation they will be asked to consider whether such material causes them to change their mind. Anything that undermines this trust can have long term negative consequences for basic research. This will work as follows. For how long? Releasing the dataset is not fully under my control, e.g.

Note that this does NOT imply that all datasets used in CVPR submissions must be public. As always, such submissions should be properly anonymized; authors are urged to take particular care to ensure that any submitted video avoids images of the authors, identifiable voices, university or lab logos, recognizable campus scenes, etc. Reviewers and area chairs will be asked to favorably consider the inclusion of a meaningful discussion of potential negative societal impact. All papers must be in English and submitted electronically in PDF (up to 6 MB) format via PaperPlaza. These responses will become part of each paper submission and will be shared with reviewers. We will instruct reviewers and area chairs to keep the code submissions confidential (just like the paper submissions), and delete all code submissions from their machine at the end of the review cycle. Reviewers will get the exact PDF file of the paper you submitted, so they can see the color images on the screen. IROS continues to be the place to learn future directions and the latest approaches, designs, and outcomes, and network with the worlds leading roboticists. Does that count as code submission? The question from the reviewers perspective is whether the authors have a full understanding of the proposed technology, such that they know under what condition it works, and under what conditions it would not work. We understand that authors might fear that complete honesty about limitations might be used by reviewers as grounds for rejection. All rights reserved. All authors are expected to be available to review (light load), unless extenuating circumstances apply. Q. The AAAI copyright block is hard-coded into the AAAI paper templates to retain proper spacing and cannot be removed; however, it is not binding until a paper is accepted and a signed copyright form is submitted by the author.

Do not include any material that would identify your institution or de-anonymize your submission in another way. Papers in this track will be reviewed according to a different evaluation rubric than papers in the main track. Q. Each paper will be allocated two new reviewers. cross-referenced with their calls for papers from WikiCFP for dates, and presents them on a timeline. (3) AIES solicits papers on ethical and societal implications of AI, such as job loss, legality of AI applications and trustworthiness. Further details are available at the Focus Areas page. No. MODIFICATIONS TO SUBMISSIONS ARE ONLY ALLOWED UNTIL THE PAPER DEADLINE. Q. This discussion can be included either in the main paper or in the supplemental material. For example, do I need to include a citation to Python, since I used Python to write my code? Unfortunately, no. A. Example topics include, but are not limited to, representation learning over trees, graphs, first-order logic formulas, and other symbolic objects; using intermediate symbolic representations within a neural network; neural network with prior symbolic knowledge, such as constraints, symbolic features; and combining traditional symbolic algorithms along with neural models. When you log in for the first time, you will be asked to set up a user profile and provide their conflict information. Q. Authors and reviewers should keep the following guidelines in mind: Q. However, if the paper gets accepted, then the authors will get a chance to update the code before it is published by adding author names, licenses, etc. All authors of AAAI-21 submissions will thus be expected to join the conferences reviewer pool unless prevented by extenuating circumstances. As we are expecting many submissions, and as each reviewer is expected to review multiple papers, larger file downloads (and uploads) will tax the system and abilities of reviewers to get to the papers fast enough. NO, it would not be automatically rejected. Is this allowed? For example, a recognition algorithm may perform poorly when image resolution is low or images are taken in low lighting. Copyright 19952021 AAAI, (Use of the files in the 2021 kit is required.

Can I link to additional image or video material from the supplemental material? Hence avoid relying only on color as the discriminative feature in plots (such as red vs. green lines), but add a second discriminative feature to ease disambiguation. The discussion shall reflect on the factors that influence the performance of the approach. The main submission may reference the supplementary material, but should be self contained. A. (1) Use the third person, rather than the first person. Q. Final decisions will be announced on December 1st. No.

The call for papers in PDF format can be found here. Experts in the field make scientific progress, not the general public. There are two cases where the existence of non-anonymous online material will not be considered a violation of AAAIs blind review policy: it is acceptable for submitted work (1) to appear in a preliminary version as an unrefereed preprint (e.g., on ArXiv.org, social media, personal websites) or in any workshop that does not have archival proceedings; or (2) to be discussed in research talks, even if abstracts or videos of such talks are made available online. The rebuttal must maintain anonymity and cannot include external links that reveal the author identity or circumvent the length restriction. About Personally Identifiable Data / Human Subjects. Given the massive recent increase in the number of submissions to AAAI conferences, we face an urgent need to increase the size of the reviewer pool. Can we submit color images with our papers for review? More information about CVF is available at http://www.cv-foundation.org/. NO. NO, you should cite research assets. Q. Please make sure to comment in the paper to request the reviewers to see the color online copy. Additional pages containing only cited references are allowed. Q. (Authors anticipating that they may make such a submission are free to submit their abstracts before Phase 1, in which case their paper will be included in Phase 1 bidding; however, authors are free to submit both abstracts and papers of Fast Track submissions until September 29, in which case bidding will occur before the start of Phase 2.). We are imposing a policy slightly stronger than what passed in the motion, where we define the social media silence period. If you do not see IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022 in the conference list already, click on the All Conferences tab and find it there. However, this definition of publication does include peer-reviewed workshop papers, even if they do not appear in a proceedings, if their length is more than four pages (excluding citations). Q. I use personally identifiable data or data from human subjects, yet I do not / cannot get IRB approval, e.g. But please remember that code submission is entirely optional, https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/CVPR2022, CVPR 2022 Author Kit for LaTeX/Word Zip file, Guidelines for the proper attribution of data assets, Policy for the use of personal data or involvement of human subjects, Guidelines for discussing potential negative societal impact, Example submission paper with detailed instructions. Can I respond to someone elses post about my arXiv submission? The assumption is that four weeks before the deadline authors have a good idea of what they will be submitting to CVPR. Authors should not be concerned that including a discussion could be viewed negatively. Note: The decision of RA-L with IROS Option and decision of RA-L is independent. A. May I build a project website related to my arXiv paper? Authors will submit PDF preprints of accepted papers (near camera-ready) for inclusion in the electronic materials made available to conference attendees by December 15, 2020. Is this permitted? RAMI (Robotics for Asset Maintenance and Inspection), F1Tenth 9th F1TENTH Autonomous Grand Prix, The IROS-RSJ Navigation and Manipulation Challenge for Young Students, EC Strategy and Funding in Robotics: Information Forum & Brokerage Event.

AAAI-21 will not consider any paper that, at the time of submission, is under review for or has already been published or accepted for publication in any archival venue such as a journal or a conference.

A single author feedback phase will give authors of papers from Phase 2 an opportunity to comment on all reviews (from both phases), running from November 3-5. This year this is projected to be from 10/19/2021 to 03/02/2022. This said, asking authors to thoroughly compare their work with arXiv reports that appeared shortly before the submission deadline imposes an unreasonable burden. Reviewers SHOULD NOT reject a paper solely because another paper with a similar idea has already appeared on arXiv. In coordination with the NeurIPS-20 and EMNLP-20 program chairs, we have therefore created a process by which such authors can submit revisions of such rejected papers directly into Phase 2. Q. Is this an issue? When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include detailed information about each reproducibility criterion as part of their Technical Appendix. AAAI will contact authors again only if problems are encountered with papers. Q. I use a private dataset for my experiments that I cannot distribute publicly. Failing to cite an arXiv paper or failing to beat its performance SHOULD NOT be sole grounds for rejection. A.

If you skip Phase 1 to get your NeurIPS/EMNLP final reviews, well hold to our rules without exceptions. If the reviewer suspects plagiarism or academic dishonesty, they are encouraged to bring these concerns to the attention of area and program chairs. Examples include code that is not sufficiently stand-alone to include (though see below for suggestions for how to handle such cases). Note also that changes in the experimental protocol mandated by the IRB can no longer be accommodated once the paper has been submitted. Note that each paper should already be registered one week earlier, by November 9, 2021. Yes, you may and it is not considered a violation of the social media ban, as long as the video (or a link of the video) is not posted on any social media platform, and it does not contain any information that would otherwise link it to your CVPR submission. http://www.ieee-ras.org/publications/ra-l.

Detailed supplementary material guidelines: NO, it would not be automatically rejected. A. Per the motion passed at CVPR 2021, this is a loophole to the original press ban principles. NO, it would not be automatically rejected. To ensure formatting compliance (e.g. Groups with large followings and the resources to mount visible social media promotions can receive significant attention for work that is under review. Legibility and clarity are always appreciated, especially as the reviewers are not obliged to look carefully. A. (2). If you know a fellow AI researcher who would like to serve on the Program Committee, please direct them to https://forms.gle/J2XZv5Gat4sD1ZzP9 to volunteer. After submission, the system will not automatically send a confirmation of receipt. Copyright 2020 GUARANT International spol. Q. Doesnt this slow down scientific progress? By submitting a paper, the authors agree to the policies stipulated in this website. Paper not respecting this format may be returned to authors without review. This differs from, for example, promotional videos posted on social media. A. NO.

When authors own previous work is relevant, they have three options, in descending order of desirability. Important: Please note that policies have been updated significantly from the 2021 version and supplemented with ethics guidelines. For over 30-years, IROS has showcased leading-edge research. its technical contribution). A. At any time, you can update this information by clicking on your name in the upper-right and selecting User information under CVPR2022. If a paper is found to have an undeclared or incorrect institutional conflict, the paper may be summarily rejected. By submitting a manuscript to CVPR, the authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue including journal, conference or workshop, or archival forum. As peer-reviewed archival publications, all accepted papers will be hosted on IEEE Xplore. NO. As per PAMI TC motion, the above definition does not consider an arXiv.org pre-print as a publication because it cannot be rejected. We expect many papers to be foundational research and not tied to particular applications, let alone deployments. Each accepted paper will be allocated 7 pages in the proceedings plus up to 2 additional pages solely for references, acknowledgements, and ethics statement. Putting a paper on arXiv for early analysis by experts is very different from publicly promoting work on social media to a broad audience. Q. Q. I use personally identifiable data or data from human subjects, but my IRB (or similar) approval is not completed.
Page not found – ISCHIASPA

Page not found

The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed.

Menu